China Conch Venture Holdings Limited is a Hong Kong-listed investment holding company that operates through the following segments - Energy Preservation and Environmental Protection Solutions, Port Logistics Services, and New Building Materials segment. An analysis of the company's environmental, social, and governance policies are as follows:
From an environmental perspective, the company scores relatively unfavorably, outperforming on the Environmental Innovation Score front, but underperforming on the Emissions Score front.
For instance, it has implemented a resource reduction policy, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has implemented a water efficiency policy, with an energy efficiency policy implemented as well. This compares to the presence of a similar policy in the prior year.
Environmental policy areas the company is currently lacking include Resource Reduction Targets, Water Efficiency Targets, Energy Efficiency Targets, Environmental Materials Sourcing, and Toxic Chemicals Reduction. Meanwhile, areas the company has addressed include Environmental Supply Chain Policy, the setup of an Environment Management Team, and Environment Management Training.
The company has also implemented renewable energy use, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has also notably not implemented green buildings as well, which compares to the lack of a defined policy in this regard in the prior year.
In terms of its carbon footprint, the company's Estimated CO2 Equivalents Emission Total stands at 139,272 in the latest fiscal year, which compares to 85,700 in the prior year and 35,556 in the year before based on CO2 Estimates.
From a social standpoint, the company scores reasonably, outperforming on the Workforce Score front, but underperforming on the Community Score front.
For instance, it has implemented a health and safety policy, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has also implemented an Employee Health & Safety Policy, with a Supply Chain Health & Safety Policy implemented as well. This compares to the presence of a similar policy in the prior year.
The company has produced a notable rise in Net Employment Creation relative to the prior year. The Number of Employees from CSR reporting totals 3,941, relative to 2,666 in the prior year and 1,725 in the year before.
As of the latest fiscal year, there have not been Management Departures, while the prior year saw no departures. Meanwhile, the company experienced no strikes this year, which compares to no strikes in the prior year.
From a governance standpoint, the company scores reasonably, particularly outperforming on the CSR Strategy Score front, but underperforming on the Management Score front.
The company does not have a Corporate Governance Board Committee, but has a Nomination Board Committee, has an Audit Board Committee, and has a Compensation Board Committee. The company does have a Board Structure Policy and does have a Policy for Board Independence in place. The Board has held four meetings in the last fiscal year, which compares to 4 in the prior year. The Board size currently stands at eight members based on the latest annual/ESG report.
The Board has an average tenure of 5.5 years, which compares to 5.3 in the prior year. The Board lacks both cultural and gender diversity.
The company has implemented a Policy for Executive Compensation Performance but has not tied its Executive Compensation Policy to ESG Performance. The company has not implemented a Policy for Executive Retention and has implemented a Succession Plan, along with an External Consultant policy.
The company has not implemented CEO-Chairman Separation and does have its CEO as a Board member. Its chairman is not an ex-CEO. Board member term duration stands at three years. In total, senior executives' compensation has increased in the latest fiscal year, along with Board member compensation. Notably, the CEO compensation is not linked to total shareholder return. Meanwhile, executive compensation is not linked to long-term objectives. Sustainability compensation incentives have not been implemented. Thus far, there have not been any executive compensation controversies.