Shun Tak Holdings: Favorable Progress Across ESG Initiatives

4.84
19 ratings

Shun Tak Holdings Limited is a holding company with holdings across the following segments - Transportation Services, Hospitality, Property and related management services, as well as Investment. An analysis of the company's environmental, social, and governance policies are as follows:


Environment


From an environmental perspective, the company scores favorably, particularly outperforming on the Resource Use Score front, but underperforming on the Environmental Innovation Score front.


For instance, it has implemented a resource reduction policy, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has implemented a water efficiency policy, with an energy efficiency policy implemented as well. This compares to the presence of a similar policy in the prior year.


Environmental policy areas the company is currently lacking include Toxic Chemicals Reduction, while areas the company has addressed include Environmental Supply Chain Policy, Resource Reduction Targets, Water Efficiency Targets, Energy Efficiency Targets, the setup of an Environment Management Team, Environment Management Training, and Environmental Materials Sourcing.


The company has also not implemented renewable energy use, which compares to the lack of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has also notably implemented green buildings as well, which compares to the lack of a defined policy in this regard in the prior year.


In terms of its carbon footprint, the company's Estimated CO2 Equivalents Emission Total stands at 420,301 in the latest fiscal year, which compares to 500,628 in the prior year and 525,536 in the year before based on Reported CO2 Estimates.


Social


From a social standpoint, the company scores favorably, particularly outperforming on the Product Responsibility Score front, but underperforming on the Human Rights Score front.


For instance, it has implemented a health and safety policy, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has also implemented an Employee Health & Safety Policy, with a Supply Chain Health & Safety Policy implemented as well. This compares to the presence of a similar policy in the prior year.


The company has produced a decline in Net Employment Creation relative to the prior year. The Number of Employees from CSR reporting totals 4,252, relative to 4,565 in the prior year and 4,453 in the year before.


As of the latest fiscal year, there have not been Management Departures, while the prior year saw no departures. Meanwhile, the company experienced no strikes this year, which compares to no strikes in the prior year.


Governance


From a governance standpoint, the company scores favorably, particularly outperforming on the Management Score front, but underperforming on the Shareholders Score front.


The company does not have a Corporate Governance Board Committee, but has a Nomination Board Committee, has an Audit Board Committee, and has a Compensation Board Committee. The company does have a Board Structure Policy and does not have a Policy for Board Independence in place. The Board has held five meetings in the last fiscal year, which compares to 6 in the prior year. The Board size currently stands at nine members based on the latest annual/ESG report.


The Board has an average tenure of 15.2 years, which compares to 14.2 in the prior year. Board diversity stands at 11.1% for cultural diversity and 33.3% for gender diversity.


The company has implemented a Policy for Executive Compensation Performance but has not tied its Executive Compensation Policy to ESG Performance. The company has implemented a Policy for Executive Retention and has implemented a Succession Plan, along with an External Consultant policy.


The company has implemented CEO-Chairman Separation and does have its CEO as a Board member. Its chairman is an ex-CEO. Board member term duration stands at three years. In total, senior executives' compensation has risen in the latest fiscal year, along with Board member compensation. Notably, the CEO compensation is not linked to total shareholder return. Meanwhile, executive compensation is not linked to long-term objectives. Sustainability compensation incentives have not been implemented. Thus far, there have not been any executive compensation controversies.


Sources:


https://www.csrhub.com/CSR_and_sustainability_information/Shun-Tak-Holdings-Limited


https://www.shuntakgroup.com/en/sustainability/sustainability-reports/index.html

Related Tags
Topics
Business FinanceInformation GovernanceManagementRecords ManagementExecutive CompensationBusinessLeadership