Tianjin Zhonghuan Semiconductor is mainly engaged in the manufacture and distribution of new energy products, along with semiconductor materials and devices. The company also operates a financial venture capital and finance leasing business within the domestic and overseas markets. An analysis of the company's environmental, social, and governance policies are as follows:
From an environmental perspective, the company scores unfavorably, outperforming on the Environmental Innovation Score front, but underperforming on the Resource Use Score front.
For instance, it has implemented a resource reduction policy, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has not implemented a water efficiency policy, with an energy efficiency policy not implemented as well. This compares to the lack of a similar policy in the prior year.
Environmental policy areas the company is currently lacking include Environmental Supply Chain Policy, Resource Reduction Targets, Water Efficiency Targets, Energy Efficiency Targets, the setup of an Environment Management Team, Environment Management Training, Environmental Materials Sourcing, and Toxic Chemicals Reduction.
The company has also not implemented renewable energy use, which compares to the lack of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has also notably not implemented green buildings as well, which compares to the lack of a defined policy in this regard in the prior year.
In terms of its carbon footprint, the company's Estimated CO2 Equivalents Emission Total stands at 239,163 in the latest fiscal year based on a Median CO2 Estimation Method.
From a social standpoint, the company scores reasonably, outperforming on the Workforce Score front, but underperforming on the Human Rights Score front.
For instance, it has implemented a health and safety policy, which compares to the presence of a clear policy in the prior year. The company has also implemented an Employee Health & Safety Policy, with a Supply Chain Health & Safety Policy not implemented as well. This compares to the lack of a similar policy in the prior year. The company has produced a rise in Net Employment Creation as of the latest fiscal year.
As of the latest fiscal year, there have not been Management Departures, while the prior year saw no departures. Meanwhile, the company experienced no strikes this year, which compares to no strikes in the prior year.
From a governance standpoint, the company scores unfavorably, outperforming on the Management Score front, but underperforming on the CSR Strategy Score front.
The company does not have a Corporate Governance Board Committee, does not have a Nomination Board Committee, does not have an Audit Board Committee, and does not have a Compensation Board Committee. The company does have a Board Structure Policy and does have a Policy for Board Independence in place. The Board has held 14 meetings in the last fiscal year. The Board size currently stands at nine members based on the latest annual/ESG report. Board diversity stands at 44.4% for gender diversity but lacks cultural diversity.
The company has implemented a Policy for Executive Compensation Performance but has not linked Executive Compensation Policy to ESG Performance. The company has implemented a Policy Executive Retention, and has not implemented a Succession Plan, and has implemented an External Consultants policy.
The company has not implemented CEO-Chairman Separation and does not have its CEO as a Board member. Its chairman is not an ex-CEO. Board member term duration stands at three years. In total, senior executives' compensation has risen in the latest fiscal year, along with Board member compensation. Notably, the CEO compensation is not linked to total shareholder return. Meanwhile, executive compensation is not linked to long-term objectives. Sustainability compensation incentives have not been implemented. Thus far, there have not been any executive compensation controversies.